Meetings between the supervisor and the student Preliminary meetings Before a student begins researching and writing a thesis, the supervisor and the student should have a detailed discussion of expectations and requirements. Below are examples of general and specific issues to be discussed during the preliminary meetings with the potential supervisor.
Insitutions are feeling financial pressure to complete candidates within 4 years and put this pressure onto supervisors, who then pressure students. But social media, by connecting students with each other, is giving some the courage to push back against this pressure.
Supervisors might feel they are doing their best for a student by behaving as described in this post, but are they really? After seeing the student counsellor, and getting advice on how to speak in a clear and non-confrontational way, I organised a meeting.
I knew I had to take the courage to address what was happening — or in the case of my progress, not happening.
I cried a lot that week, and could feel myself slipping into the helpless depression Phd thesis supervisor comes from feeling powerless and bullied.
As it happens I was not trying to do anything too radical with my approach to research and writing. I wanted to understand the big picture of my research field, try to learn some theory and apply it appropriately.
I wanted to write about my insights on policy and current practice in relation to my topic area, based on published, scholarly literature. Phd thesis supervisor I wanted to come out confident I had contributed something to knowledge via my topic, gained valuable skills and expertise, but still have lots more to learn.
Personal growth and insight would come in parallel with the academic skills as part of the complex PhD journey. This was not the paradigm presented to me in, what turned out to be, my final meeting with my now ex-supervisor. My summary of her description is this: The topic is not what is important — all that matters is getting finished and being able then to move on to something interesting and collaborative.
If I asked a question, expect to be told to find my own answer. If that answer is wrong, be sent away to come up with another one. Spend months alone with the data, going over and over until eventually a lightbulb moment happens. Exclude everything else from life until it is done, because it is the piece of paper that matters, and opens doors to other opportunities.
This is the way of modern academia. This is how she had been supervised, with a powerful mentor who fast-tracked her to completion and a high position within a short time of arriving at the university.
The process, and deep thinking or wide learning were deemed less important than the status at the end.
I am better now at standing up for what I believe in. In our last supervision session my request to discuss how we worked, my inability to make progress with her way of responding to my work in progress, the tears pouring down my face, were not mentioned. Instead I was given a description of how they all work when writing an article together: The page from Stylish Academic Writing Sword, describing what made a good article, which I had sent in the interests of sharing something I was reading, was mocked as being wrong and not in line with current practice.
This response showed neither an understanding of feminism nor my own intention to complete in a timely manner The upshot of this meeting was: It suits the hard, vocation-oriented direction universities are taking.
They are businesses first, institutes of learning second. It bothers me, though. What kind of scholars is this fast-track paradigm creating? What impact is it having on the breadth of knowledge and depth of understanding, and the development of creative thinking and opportunities for excellent teachers to pass on thoughtful approaches and considerate practice?
Through social media I have learned that there are alternative ways to approach an idea, learn about a topic, publication and discussion. Throughout Twitter has been an associate supervisor, guiding me, offering support and encouragement, the latest research about my topic.
It has been an important aspect of my candidature to date, and has contributed significantly to the resilience and confidence I feel as I seek a new supervisor to work with IRL to help me get finished in a timely manner, with deep learning along the way.
Postscript 4 December I wrote the piece above just after the rift with my ex-supervisors happened, when I was full of grief, outrage, and frustration. Since then I have found new supervisors who are determined to keep me focused and finished, but are also open to a diversity of approaches and working in a way that suits me.This thesis addresses the challenges of building a software system for general-purpose runtime code manipulation.
Modern applications, with dynamically-loaded modules and dynamically-generated code, are assembled at runtime.
How I broke up with my supervisor. October 2, · by Thesis Whisperer. This post, written by a PhD student, who wishes to stay anonymous, was sent to me late last year. Due to my new job, it’s taken me a long time to edit it down and make sure it doesn’t identify the student or their supervisor.
Good luck and best wishes to all PhD. The need for CO₂ reduction, the increasing complexity of new powertrain systems, and a requirement to achieve the highest possible level of process efficiency - along with the need to quickly launch new models - are some of the key challenges facing the automotive industry now and for .
It’s a huge issue, and emerging as a key, unspoken problem in academia, as well as the PhD. I believe there is some good work presently being done, which I will talk about in a future post. A thesis or dissertation is a document submitted in support of candidature for an academic degree or professional qualification presenting the author's research and findings.
In some contexts, the word "thesis" or a cognate is used for part of a bachelor's or master's course, while "dissertation" is normally applied to a doctorate, while in other contexts, the reverse is true. The doctoral thesis supervisor. 1. an appointment as co-supervisor applies for the entire duration of the PhD programme, even if the co-supervisor is appointed Professor in the interim.
2. In principle, no more than two co-supervisors may be appointed. The Dean may appoint a third co-supervisor, subject to the prior written approval of the.